Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Creative Labs (CREAF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: taxikid who wrote (5538)	11/11/1997 8:54:00 AM
From: CJay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13925

Taxi: My response to you was courteous--I just questioned you, thats all. I am way ahead--bought back in during the 10/28 meltdown. Taxi, right before 10/28 Chip said the stock wa going to 16---instead 2 weeks later, its at an alltime HIGH of 28. NObody made money shorting CREAF unless they sold in the am of 10/28. But why did Chip do that, at 22, if the stock was going to 16 next month? So other than that, the stock has gone straightup in a down market. So how is he right if he said the stock was going to 16 or 18 and its over 28 two weeks later? Also, the one dip to 22 was not caused by Ng or Chay or TA analysis (as Chip says but DISCOURTEOUSLY fails to explain). It was a broadbased market selloff. I have made money in and out on this stock since 14 1/2, so please don't question my credentials. This guy is the one who has credibility issues. And after volunteering his confirms to Jon Tara, he now wants to make a bet about it. No analysis, now no proof---if I bet him I am sure it will be "the confirms are in the mail." I have the right to expose a BS artist--and if you are a big poster here, you should be insulted--what did you ever get out of any of his posts? Just explain how he was right again.