To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (193369 ) 10/24/2010 7:10:58 PM From: marcos Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 313893 Which, ssl.v? - yes, may not have bottomed quite yet according to the chart ... same for ogc.to possibly, who knows ... but we're talking pennies of difference, in re companies of quality ... talking days or weeks of time as well, sure ... whoop-de-doo, another day another dollar for the lucky, some care some don't, i think many small punters do not operate on this momentary level, while many larger ones would like to, are crafty enough to, but can't due to their relative size ... i hold both of these with a 'review annually in spring' mindset, really don't much care where they go meantime ... few more per cent down and i'll add tiny symbolic amounts of each, fifty per cent up and i'll peel a few [in sheltered accts], otherwise they generate interest only for discussion 'no idea of the FA ' - aha, a basic factor of my point, and major ... there are a number of FA facets by which it is possible to guesstimate fairly objectively what bids these outfits will attract over coming years, biggest would be history of managements, prospective cash flows, and a chart of the price of gold ... which latter brings quick and dirty TA into the equation - what makes momo players unable to slip in a little FA where appropriate, lol Both these outfits are sold down recently because they're getting financed by some serious money, which due to its size relative to yours and mine, could arguably be suspected to have a smart or two more? ... more heft in any case, and with heft can follow promo dmm.to - you're really not going to like my third largest position, i can tell, lol [ogc is second, ssl+wt fifth or sixth]