SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ForYourEyesOnly who wrote (8961)11/11/1997 1:16:00 AM
From: Yousef  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25960
 
THC,

Re: "Many manufacturers have found the switch to DUV to
be difficult ..."

We have done a source inspection which includes printing wafers for
resolution and overlay (checks both alignment and distortion). Our
machine easily met specifications ... this is classic Nikon, they set
very conservative specs that they meet 99.5% of the time.

BTW, I am more concerned with selecting a DUV resist and determining
whether to use a BARC (Bottom Anti Relecting Layer) on a number of
different surfaces (poly, TiN, Si3N4, SiO2 ...). Each of these surfaces
will have to be optimized with the litho and etch processes. I'm expecting
the DUV exposure tool to operate very smoothly.

Yousef



To: ForYourEyesOnly who wrote (8961)11/11/1997 1:24:00 AM
From: AJM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25960
 
Does anyone know if these "nice circles" are a result of the 'vibration problems' we've heard about in the past?