Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (124880)	10/26/2010 12:51:37 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

yes I could that's an easy one. I asked both of my conservative sons and they both got all 5. Coons is a freaking lawyer. Coons is the same old elitist politician that we have in Washington, he thinks he's better than you. did you find the phrase separation of church and state in the constitution yet ?

To: puborectalis who wrote (124880)	10/26/2010 1:05:51 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 132070

Obama the Uniter: Republicans “Gotta Sit in Back” Posted by Jim Hoft on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 5:17 AM Worst. President. Ever. Barack Obama added a new line to his speech yesterday. Now he says, “Republicans gotta sit in back.” Classy. The AP reported: In a little more than five hours in the state, Obama was booked for a factory tour and for a pair of fundraisers that party officials said would bring in $500,000. He said Republicans had driven the economy into a ditch and then stood by and criticized while Democrats pulled it out. Now that progress has been made, he said, “we can’t have special interests sitting shotgun. We gotta have middle class families up in front. We don’t mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back.“ Democrat Frank Caprio may have said it best… He can shove it. gatewaypundit.firstthings.com

To: puborectalis who wrote (124880)	10/27/2010 11:43:27 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 132070

Comments on the latest example of Teabagger violence and anti Americanism, the Rand Paul staffer who stomped on a woman's head after the other courageous patriots knocked her to the ground: 1. This is not unsimilar to the Sharron Angle staffer who punched out a woman at a non-partisan event, except more so. In both cases, the principals disavowed the staffers and were not real close to the incident. Heck, Al Capone was in Florida during The St. Valentine's Day Massacre, so he nothing to do with it, right? <G> 2. For the second time, it was male on female violence, due to the heroic nature of Teabaggers. Misogyny has not been a major theme of Teabaggers, not with so many goofy female candidates on their slate. Racism and violence have been their main themes, so I think the male on female bit is more coincidence and cowardice (a man might hit back) that orchestrated. 3. It was bad for political behavior, but not so bad for violence. I have seen stompings in the past and this was fairly mild. In fact, the guy was more grinding her head and shoulder into the floor than actively kicking it. It looked like he just wanted to squelch free speech, not kill the speaker. 4. Some GOP types have reminded us of Kerry being attacked by a loony at a speech. The guy was running at him and comedian Al Franken took him down and disabled him until security could arrive. Lots of differences. The guy was male. He was in physical attack mode, not asking an incovenient question. Franken didn't pound on him, he just wrestled him. 5. As we get closer to the election, the Teabaggers are showing their true colors more and more, with racism and violence at the top of their charts. Fun to watch them, hopefully, self destruct.