SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: puborectalis who wrote (124884)10/26/2010 5:53:14 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 132070
 
ACORN’S BERTHA LEWIS MAKES SOCIALIST CASE FOR OPEN IMMIGRATION

We’re getting ready to me a majority, minority country. Shhhh. [applause] We’ll be like South Africa. More black people than white people. [laughter] Don’t tell anybody."

breitbart.tv



To: puborectalis who wrote (124884)10/26/2010 5:54:21 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 132070
 
Soros group launches attack on poll watchers
Jackson Lee accused of threatening observers with Justice investigation
October 25, 2010
By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
wnd.com

A George Soros-funded organization, aided by Texas U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, a Democrat, apparently is trying to chase volunteer observers from precinct polling locations across Harris County, Texas, after the watchers found election judges and clerks allegedly voting for citizens who were undecided.

"Only a week into early voting, volunteer poll-watchers also are being verbally and physically harassed by people loitering at the polls with no intention to vote at the time, including a man identified as a reverend and Houston Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, who was seen inside the polling location electioneering and threatening to turn a poll-watcher's name to the Department of Justice for voter intimidation," said a statement from Liberty Institute.

The dispute has its roots in the bitter fight over elections that has developed in 2010, as Democrats both nationally and locally are feeling the sting of abandonment by voters who are enraged by the general takeover of society being pursued by President Obama.

WND reported just days ago when the U.S. Department of Justice confirmed it would investigate Democrat complaints of "intimidation" by "white middle class" poll observers in minority precincts in Harris County. They were accused of "hovering" around voters.

That followed by only months a decision at the highest levels of the DOJ that the charges in a case against members of the New Black Panther party, caught on video swinging a baton in front of a Philadelphia polling station in 2008, mostly would be dropped.

Find out what it will take to fix the nation. Get "Taking America Back," Joseph Farah's manifesto for sovereignty, self-reliance and moral renewal

The situation in Houston erupted after workers with a volunteer organization called True the Vote investigated the work of a Houston Votes group and found that of the 25,000 voter registrations submitted, only 7,193 apparently were actually valid.

A video reveals Houston Votes project director Sean Caddle, who reportedly worked with Service Employees International Union, admitting that there could have been mistakes and "fraud" in signing up voters, including the case of a woman who was signed up to vote six times in a single day.

Houston Votes Project Director admits to possible voter fraud
youtube.com!

Then a lawsuit was filed against the King Street Patriots, a group of volunteer poll-watchers, by the Texas Democratic Party, and a "coordinated" ethics complaint was filed by Texans for Public Justice, which gets funding from the Soros-linked Open Society Institute, according to officials with Liberty Institute.

Spokesman Kelly Shackelford of Liberty Institute told WND that the attack appears to be an attempt to rid the polling stations of outside observers who already have written up a long list of concerns about election judges telling people out how vote, shadowing voters as they cast their votes, and even "voting for people who did not know for whom they wanted to vote."

"These lawsuits are exactly the kind of abusive disrespect for citizens that got our political leaders into trouble," said Catherine Engelbrecht, chief of the King Street Patriots. "We will not be intimidated by partisan attacks, by the Democratic party, or by anyone else."

Shackelford said he has filed a response in court to the lawsuit by the Democrats, explaining that the claims largely are baseless.

"As a matter of law, corporations cannot sue individuals for defamation; this attack in baseless," he said. "All these attacks are clearly an attempt to bully and silence a group of volunteer citizens who are just trying to keep the election process honest.

"This is pure desperation by a Democratic Party everyone knows is not doing so well."

His office has seen complaints that poll watchers are being threatened, intimidated and abused, the report from Liberty Institute confirmed today.

A video posted online purported reveals Jackson Lee "electioneering" not far from a polling station:
youtube.com

The complaint over her actions was being forwarded to county election officials, Shackelford told WND:

Complaint about U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee

Jackson Lee declined to respond to WND's request for comment, and a staff member said she considers allegations of voter intimidation very serious and that's why she wants the Justice Department to be involved.

Shackelford told WND the King Street Patriots became concerned after the discovery of the "massive voter irregularity." They decided to get training, find their own sponsors, and watch the actions at the precinct polling locations.

He said among the reports that have come in were those that poll watchers saw election officials actually voting for some residents, and other election officials encouraging voters to pursue a straight party-line ticket.

Some of the observers, ordinary volunteers including housewives and others, "have been coming back in tears, completely shocked by the treatment they've received," he said.

Shackelford warned that if it's going on in one county, too, there undoubtedly would be other counties with election issues.

But he said the idea is spreading, and there probably are several dozen other organizations that have sprung up around the nation intent on watching out for and reporting any election law violation or fraud.

Earlier, when the complaints about intimidation first erupted, Terry O'Rourke, the first assistant in the county attorney's office, said the poll watchers were "almost all white and middle class" and were going into "low-income neighborhoods."

At that time it was Gerry Birnberg, the Harris County Democratic chairman, who told reporters that a number of complaints had been submitted about poll watchers "hovering" over voters and "getting in their face."

A spokeswoman for local U.S. attorney's office said their team was playing no role in the review of events, but that the investigators from the DOJ headquarters in Washington were involved, and a spokesman in D.C. confirmed that for WND.

She described the involvement of the agency run by Attorney General Eric Holder as "looking into allegations of voter intimidation."

At the Washington Examiner, opinion Editor David Freddoso wrote under the headline: "DOJ goes after tea partiers, leaves club-wielding Black Panthers alone."

"It may well be that these tea partiers (or other poll watchers, since it's not clear who belongs to the group) are out of line in some of their behavior (not unlike Michelle Obama on her trip to the polls), and if so, they should be kicked out of the polling places and punished for whatever the problem is. But given that the case against them has been built and brought by the Texas Democratic Party, it's at least worth considering what sort of collusion is going on and whether the problem is that there are poll watchers in certain locations, full stop.

"Obama's politicized Justice Department has already lost all credibility when it comes to even-handed administration of justice on this matter. They let the Black Panthers off with one wrist-slap and two complete dismissals after their flagrant voter intimidation was caught on tape. Now they're worried about poll watchers 'talking to voters…'" he continued.

His reference to Michelle Obama was over the recent report, highlighted on the Drudge Report, about how she voted in Illinois, then let other voters take photographs with her.

"She was telling me how important it was to vote to keep her husband's agenda going," reported electrician Dennis Campbell.

But Drudge quoted a state law that prohibits electioneering within 100 feet of a polling place.

No problem, Drudge quoted a state board of elections official explaining, "You kind of have to drop the standard for the first lady, right? I mean, she's pretty well liked and probably doesn't know what she's doing."

WND previously reported on the Philadelphia case, which was documented on video.

As WND reported, the Justice Department originally brought the case against four armed men who witnesses say derided voters with catcalls of "white devil" and "cracker" and told voters they should prepare to be "ruled by the black man."

One poll watcher called police after he reportedly saw one of the men brandishing a nightstick to threaten voters.

"As I walked up, they closed ranks, next to each other," the witness told Fox News at the time. "So I walked directly in between them, went inside and found the poll watchers. They said they'd been here for about an hour. And they told us not to come outside because a black man is going to win this election no matter what."

He said the man with a nightstick told him, "'We're tired of white supremacy,' and he starts tapping the nightstick in his hand. At which point I said, 'OK, we're not going to get in a fistfight right here,' and I called the police."

Subsequently, former DOJ attorney J. Christian Adams testified before the U.S. Civil Rights Commission that the Voting Section of Attorney General Eric Holder's organization is dominated by a "culture of hostility" toward bringing cases against blacks and other minorities who violate voting-rights laws.

Further, two other former U.S. Department of Justice attorneys later corroborated key elements of the explosive allegations by Adams.

One of Adams' DOJ colleagues, former Voting Section trial attorney Hans A. von Spakovsky, told WND he saw Adams was being attacked in the media for lack of corroboration. He said he knew Adams was telling the truth, so he decided on his own to step forward.

It was Adams who had been ordered by his superiors to drop a case prosecutors already had won. When they were ordered to stop prosecution, Adams and the team of DOJ lawyers had already won the case by default because the New Black Panthers declined to defend themselves in court. At that point in the proceedings, the DOJ team was simply waiting for the judge to assign penalties against the New Black Panthers.



To: puborectalis who wrote (124884)10/26/2010 7:23:46 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 132070
 
GOV CHRISTIE RAVES OVER O’KEEFE ‘TEACHERS GONE WILD’ VIDEO

breitbart.tv



To: puborectalis who wrote (124884)10/27/2010 2:25:26 AM
From: Skeeter Bug1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
>>your message is old....we had 8 years of that futility.....maybe GOP gets back in the White House in 2016.<<

could you please get obama to scale back military spending to at least bush's numbers?

it isn't right vs left - that's phony and designed to keep you on the mental plantation.

it is establishment - both left and right - against the citizenry.

obama has borrowed nearly $5 trillion and poverty simply sky rockets b/c obama has ZERO intent to spend that money on poor people.

almost all of it goes to the richest people the planet has ever known.



To: puborectalis who wrote (124884)10/27/2010 11:08:58 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 132070
 
CHRIS COONS LIED, GRANNY DIED
by Ann Coulter
October 20, 2010

In all of life's tribulations, there is nothing so aggravating as being condescended to by an idiot. In last week's CNN debate in the Senate race between the astonishingly well-spoken Christine O'Donnell and the unfortunate-looking Chris Coons, O'Donnell had to put up with it from Coons for 90 minutes.

O'Donnell wiped the floor with Coons, moderators Wolf Blitzer and Nancy Karibjanian, and the idiotic University of Delaware students asking questions -- all of whom were against her.

(With the nation on the verge of another great depression -- the brunt of which, to my delight, will fall most heavily on college students -- guess what the dunderheads asked? GUESS! That's right: They asked about abortion "in the case of rape or incest," "don't ask, don't tell," doing something about "our carbon footprint," and the kook-minister who was going to burn Korans, because ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE, I TELL YOU!)

O'Donnell's responses couldn't have been better if Thomas Sowell were whispering them in her ear. But after every well-thought-out answer she gave, Coons would act as if O'Donnell were speaking in tongues and make a dismissive remark to the moderators: "If you can reconcile all those comments, you're an even more talented reporter than I think you are, Nancy."

(O'Donnell managed to simply answer the questions without wasting everyone's time with snippy asides about Coons' replies.)

Then Coons would say something incomprehensible, false or insane -- such as his conspiracy theory about the Australians uniting with the Chinese against America.

Yes, Australia, America's most loyal ally.

After O'Donnell described the China problem with absolute precision -- the Chinese hold so much of our debt, we can't hold them accountable in their dealings with Iran or North Korea -- Coons smirkingly replied: "It's hard for me to respond effectively, Wolf, to all the different issues that my opponent has raised in previous statements, and I'll just let that stand."

Then he launched his Chinese-Australian conspiracy theory!

Coons said: "The Australian navy engaged in joint exercises with the Chinese and specifically excluded us recently. A dramatic shift in the Australian policy."

Somehow, The New York Times had missed the national security implications of Australia's engaging in naval exercises with China! Either that or Coons is Dennis Kucinich, I've-got-eight-test-tube-babies-and-I'm-broke crazy.

Weirdly, though, considering Australia is snubbing the U.S. and sidling up to China, the Australian navy also recently staged a dramatic re-enactment of Gen. Douglas MacArthur's Incheon landing during the Korean War, which saved Australian troops from annihilation.

It's strange that the Australians would honor America -- or as the North Koreans put it, try to impress "U.S. sycophants and lackeys" -- just as they're distancing themselves from us. Maybe that's why no one else in the developed world is worried about Australia's joint naval exercises with China.

(But The Weekly World News is jumping right on it!)

In contrast to O'Donnell's manifestly true point that "China could take us over monetarily before they could militarily," Coons seemed more worried about a military invasion. He warned that "as the Chinese have become economically stronger, they are seeking to become militarily stronger."

(O'Donnell quipped: "Are you saying that China has a plot to take over America?" -- exactly what she has been falsely accused of saying.)

If you do nothing else before casting your vote, Delawareans, ask people who know something if China poses more of a military threat, or a monetary threat, to us. (Make sure they know you're talking about China the country, not singer/actress Chynna Phillips.)

What should worry Delaware voters even more than Coons' demanding a first strike against China was the elaborate lying he did -- on stage, in front of everyone -- about his family's financial interest in cap and trade.

Responding to the question about "our carbon footprint" from a student who will be living with his parents soon, O'Donnell gave a tour-de-force attack on the cap-and-trade bill, mentioning the massive electricity bills that will devastate Delaware's farmers and elderly citizens.

She concluded by asking Coons: "Speaking of cap and trade, your family business stands to financially benefit from some environmental legislation under Bush -- "

Then she was cut off by the moderator.

Coons sneered: "A fascinating question that really makes no sense, yet, so if you'd like to -- better ask the whole question, I'd be -- what's she talking about?"

O'Donnell said sweetly, "I'd like to know if your family business stands to have a financial gain if cap and trade is passed and, if so, would you recuse yourself in the lame duck sessions from voting with Harry Reid?"

Coons again scoffed at O'Donnell: "Fascinating question. No."

Thinking he had caught O'Donnell in a gaffe, Blitzer asked for her evidence. Oops!

O'Donnell cited W.L. Gore -- the company owned by Coon's stepfather, which also provided Coons with the only for-profit job he ever held -- and said that the company makes fuel cells and other things that companies will be forced to buy under cap and trade. (Making W.L. Gore at least the second entity named "Gore" to cash in on the global warming hoax, by the way.)

Blitzer asked Coons, "Is that true?" Oops, again!

Amid a litany of irrelevancies and insults -- That's quite a stretch, Gore makes a lot of products, we also sell dental floss! -- Coons finally coughed up the truth: Yes, Gore will benefit if cap and trade becomes law.

He explained his earlier, by-now-obvious lie by saying that "it took a couple of minutes to even understand what she was talking about."

Really? That's strange, because according to Delaware newspaper articles not seven years ago, Coons himself -- as the lawyer for Daddy's company –- deployed Gore scientists to testify before Congress in favor of environmental mandates because, as Coons said, it was good for business.

On Nov. 16, 2003, "company lawyer Christopher Coons" told Wilmington's News Journal: "This is one of those very rare moments where the legislative outcome matters to Gore."

I guess now we know why Coons kept pretending he couldn't understand the batty dame.



To: puborectalis who wrote (124884)10/28/2010 4:55:09 PM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations  Respond to of 132070
 
Obama Laughed At by Jon Stewart’s Audience

At this point, not even establishment moonbats can take the erstwhile Anointed One seriously as he flounders pathetically amid the ruin he has made of the Democrat Party. WaPo's Dana Milbank shakes his head in grief over the dishonor Obama has brought to the presidency by subjecting himself to Jon Stewart's ridicule:

On Comedy Central, the joke was on President Obama Wednesday night.

The president had come, on the eve of what will almost certainly be the loss of his governing majority, to plead his case before Jon Stewart, gatekeeper of the disillusioned left. But instead of displaying the sizzle that won him an army of youthful supporters two years ago, Obama had a Brownie moment.

The Daily Show host was giving Obama a tough time about hiring the conventional and Clintonian Larry Summers as his top economic advisor.

"In fairness," the president replied defensively, "Larry Summers did a heckuva job."

"You don't want to use that phrase, dude," Stewart recommended with a laugh.

Dude. The indignity of a comedy show host calling the commander in chief "dude" pretty well captured the moment for Obama.

Try to imagine Ronaldus Magnus crawling into a playpen to unsuccessfully beg a professional clown for approval.

A low point in American history came after Stewart asked,

"You wouldn't say you'd run this time as a pragmatist? It wouldn't be, 'Yes we can, given certain conditions?'"

"I think what I would say is yes we can, but — "

Stewart, and the audience, laughed at the "but."

Obama didn't laugh.

Stewart's liberal audience wasn't laughing with him, but at him — and at anyone who still takes this tragic farce of a presidency seriously.

Not exactly up there with Washington crossing the Delaware.

rightwingnews.com