Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (9380)	11/1/2010 6:44:50 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

<Sounds like you're saying ID is a theory of evolution?> In BeHe's mind if I remember correctly...you never DID post his theory, so I doubt there is actually one. I think that's the whole reason scientists don't like the Dude, he's "proclaimed" there is a theory... but it hasn't been enunciated. Besides, that term (creationist) has been saved for the real wacko's in common usage: <<the term is more commonly used to refer to religiously motivated rejection of certain biological processes, in particular much of evolution, as an explanation accounting for the history, diversity, and complexity of life on earth.[2]>> -Wikepedia We MUST continue (in our quewst for the truth) point out however, that as usual, you use evidence FOR evolution to assert it doesn't exist: <<mistaken assertion that "Intelligent design (ID) proponents believe that much of modern science is wrong>> HUH!?! using support for modern science to show modern science is wrong: What a nutcase. Might want to retake that science 101 course you seemed to have completely missed. THEN you could post and talk about these things without looking like a complete moron. DAK