Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (67657)	10/29/2010 3:40:19 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220085

ElM, that's not a win-win, it's a lose-lose. <So Camargo began studying thousands of pages of WTO rules. He wanted to find countries — big countries — that were breaking the rules.> Thousands of pages of nonsense rubbish designed to keep swarms of kleptocrats in the manner to which they have become accustomed. Best to throw the whole lot in the rubbish [or recycled to make the cellulose into ethanol for fuel cells]. People can buy and sell among themselves as they see fit. If Europe wants to take money away from useful people and give it to useless ones to produce sugar to be sold at a loss to Brazil, leave them to it. Grow something else in Brazil instead of sugar and produce the things that the useful workers in Europe are producing and do it much cheaper. Brazil winning against Europe would mean producing goods and services better and cheaper than Europeans can do. When Brazilian cars are flooding into NZ instead of BMW Mercedes, Audi, Fiat and what have you, then we will know Brazil is winning against Europe [or something else if not cars]. Mqurice