SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (148427)10/29/2010 11:19:52 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543516
 
"There is no reason in the world why a school with a knowledgeable principle and a good staff of teachers can't educate our children well."

Q.E.D.

I would say that there are no good reasons for it. But there are certainly plenty of possible reasons. Let's see now, in no particular order and off the top of my head: classrooms designed for 20-25 having 40-45 children in it; a building that is too hot or too cold and has broken windows or a leaky roof that doesn't get fixed; children coming to school hungry, tired or without adequate nutrition at hom; children coming to school with parents who stressed about money, about their job, about finding the rent the next month and unable to pay enough attention to them; no books in the house; textbooks that are in bad condition and are outdated; schools where the number of kids entering and leaving the school in any given year (called "transition" students) are between 30 and 60% of the school population. That is just a quick list that I could easily add to if necessary. I'm sure Blue would have something say about it too, if she happens to read this post.

Yeah, I know the response--"a knowledgeable principle and a good staff of teachers" wouldn't tolerate those conditions. ROFL, that's right, if they found themselves in that situation, most of them would quit after knocking their heads against the wall and go to a system that not only wouldn't tolerate these things, but had the resources to address them. But there are plenty of school systems out there that don't tolerate it in theory but are forced to by (a) inadequate funding and (b) the nature of the environment of the sending school district.

Anyone who doesn't admit this is an ass who hasn't been to any number of school districts in the country, both in big cities and rural areas.