SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Smith who wrote (148679)11/1/2010 8:15:27 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543314
 
Those states that are not in trouble are probably going to be low population relatively homogeneous states that get a lot of Federal dollars per capita and have some economic advantage like a lot of energy or natural resources that they can sell outside their own state and tax it relatively heavily. Like, e.g., Alaska or Wyoming. Name some others that allegedly have their house in fiscal order.

Yeah, you're right, low population, relatively homogeneous white states tend to have Republican governments.



To: Paul Smith who wrote (148679)11/1/2010 8:50:18 PM
From: Metacomet  Respond to of 543314
 
Some states are not in trouble because they made better choices.

Like foregoing unnecessary wars and things like that?



To: Paul Smith who wrote (148679)11/1/2010 9:11:40 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543314
 

Some states are not in trouble because they made better choices.

Why don't you give us a concrete case of state that isn't in trouble because it made "better choices" and why it made those choices rather than one of the bad choices that the ones in trouble made. I assume, since you made the statement, that you must be thinking of some example.