Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grabs who wrote (25378)	11/11/1997 9:46:00 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Respond to of 35569

I got this info ..via e-mail, a good source of info. Delays -Delays-Delays!: >>>Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 17:51:41 -0600 >>>> >>>>Eli said that he would be in Phoenix by now if Lee Furlongs' 83 year old >father hadn't passed away. Peace to that family and Lee's going till the end >dad who refused to stay in the hospital and wait for the end.( others' ails >also for quite some time) >>>> Eli is packing up for PHX now. Had lunch with Alan Doyle on his way through L.A. towards Pheonix, yesterday. Alan is in PHX now. >>>> I asked if the 29 new drill holes (overdue info) would be considered >in the release so as to shock us..no on that, and on the original samples in >storage. Later. Not to have anything in but Bateman / BD type ( auric too I >suppose) verifications. HE WILL NOT KNOWN IF HE AND IPM WILL WRITE UP THE >REPORT OR IF PARTS OR ALL ( he assumes not all of a multi page Bateman Type >report will be released out) will BE WRITTEN IN THE NEWS RELEASE...untill >tomorrow ...for some reason I supose. >>>> Bateman must be on everyones MIND AS TO THERIR ROLE and that role is >PRODUCTION and should BE PARAMOUNT. >>>> Going though the exchanges is on a "simplifcation of report " basis >with other news released afterward on an ONGOING BASIS...rather than like it >has been with this artificial HOLDUP OF NEWS. >>>> >>>

To: Grabs who wrote (25378)	11/11/1997 11:04:00 AM
From: Proton	Respond to of 35569

Re: News and Opinion Thanks for your kind words, Gary. You may have seen a version of my post where I mentioned going to W.M. Jill regarding some of the more toxic posters. On reflection, I edited that part out of the message, because I agree with you. Mere negativism is not a sufficient reason for give a poster the hook. One of the most irritating parts of the last week has been how every skeptic has been greeted. In at least one case, even the motives behind a simple question were challenged because the poster has committed the crime of discussing short selling in another thread. Outrageous! Thank you for the update from Eli, but you must now join my list of people with the irritating habit of bringing useful information to the thread. {huge grin} Pý