House Republicans are going to try to shoot some Democrats when they get to be the majority again. Actually, I think that this may well backfire on them. We'll see. Depends on how well prepared the Obama people will be to defend the health care act.
House takeover would give GOP ways to attack health law
By Marilyn Werber Serafini | Kaiser Health News
WASHINGTON — If Rep. Joe Barton becomes the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee next year, the Texas Republican vows to make life miserable for Democratic defenders of the health care overhaul law.
He'll drag Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Medicare chief Donald Berwick to Capitol Hill for regular grilling. Democrats, he says, essentially have shielded the two key figures from answering tough questions about the new law.
That's just the beginning. Barton has a list of seven problems he intends to spotlight, including how he thinks that the Obama administration covered up cost estimates of the law before it was enacted, silenced insurers from warning customers about what they thought would be rate increases and spent money on brochures touting improvements to the Medicare Advantage program even though funding is being reduced.
While repealing the new law remains the first order of business for angry Republicans, most acknowledge that it's a long shot, considering President Barack Obama's veto power. Still, they'll possess some powerful tools to challenge the law if they win a majority in the House of Representatives — as is widely forecast — and take over leadership of the committees.
Key Republicans are threatening to withhold funding for the overhaul's initiatives and to pursue hearings and oversight investigations in order to challenge administration officials' regulations and communications with the public. Committee chairmen have subpoena power, although holding the gavel is usually enough to get officials into the witness chair.
"Oversight of the existing law will build a case for full repeal," Barton said. "We have to aggressively work to repeal the entire bill. As part of the process, we'll have very aggressive oversight."
Sen. Michael Enzi of Wyoming, the top Republican on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, used the Congressional Review Act of 1996 in September to force a vote to kill a key interim health law rule that HHS had issued but not finalized. Republicans argued that the rule would make it nearly impossible for businesses to get grandfathered status, without which they'd be subject to new requirements that could increase their costs.
The effort failed, but Republicans could use the Congressional Review Act again to block the regulation, a Republican congressional aide said. "You could have hearings leading up to that regulation and have a lot of people come and testify about what people see as the downside, and have this vote, which could be a major vote," the aide said, speaking only on the condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to talk on the record.
Barton probably will face a challenge for the top committee spot from Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., but Upton also is pledging intensive oversight of regulations.
In a column Oct. 4 on the conservative website The Daily Caller, Upton wrote: "Over 4,100 pages of regulations have been issued since the measure was signed into law, and a dozen new regulations were not even subject to any kind of public scrutiny before taking effect."
"As we work to take this bill apart," he added, "we cannot allow the administration to take a wide berth on interpreting bad legislation to make it worse."
If he's the chairman, Barton said, he'll investigate why Sebelius "issued a gag order to insurers when they began to talk about the possibility of Obamacare forcing (insurance) rate increases." High on his agenda is exploring why Medicare's chief actuary, Richard Foster, "has concluded that the president's health care law will not rein in rising costs and federal spending," and why Foster "was unable to project costs of the president's bill until after it was passed by the House."
Barton also accuses Sebelius of using government money to pay for propaganda. Rep. Darrell Issa of California, the top Republican on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee and another possible chairman-in-waiting, joined Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., in asking the Government Accountability Office to investigate television ads in which actor Andy Griffith touts the benefits of the new law for seniors. "More good things are coming, like free checkups, lower prescription costs and better ways to protect us and Medicare from fraud," he says with his best, down-home Mayberry smile. "I think you're gonna like it."
The GAO found the ads legal, but James Gelfand, the director of health policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, predicts continued objections to them. He has a "strong feeling there is going to be some investigations into Andy Griffith, and I don't mean Mayberry."
Gelfand has created his own list of 31 "possible investigations," including one of the new HHS Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, which will help implement provisions that deal with private health insurance.
"This is a large, new agency within HHS that's been granted vast oversight powers," Gelfand said. "There are questions about where in the legislation they found the authority to create this at all. ... I've heard House Republicans rumbling about it."
It's more fodder for an interrogation of Sebelius. Rep. Michael Burgess of Texas, who's the top Republican on the House Energy Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations and a candidate for chairman if the GOP takes the House, has been frustrated in his attempts to get answers from her. In September, Burgess sent a letter to committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., complaining that he's ignored requests to bring Sebelius to the committee to talk about implementation. "It has now been six months since the passage," he complained.
Burgess said he'd make up for lost time in January.
While acknowledging the damaging impact that oversight can have on an administration, Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg said that Democrats should welcome the challenge next year as an invitation to get loud about new benefits that polls find that people like, such as allowing some adult children to remain on their parents' policies until age 26 and prohibiting insurers from canceling policies in most cases.
"Democrats need to join the fight," he said.
(Marilyn Werber Serafini is the Kaiser Family Foundation's Robin Toner Distinguished Fellow at Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service that's a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization that isn't affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.
Read more: mcclatchydc.com |
