SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spekulatius who wrote (39900)11/3/2010 11:46:34 AM
From: Jurgis Bekepuris  Respond to of 78748
 
Well, if you say "probably closer to 1%" then we agree on the probability.

In terms of tools, I think we are talking about tools for different purposes. I was talking about tools to manage the budget deficit, clean up the balance sheet and strengthen the perception before things slide into panic. It seems that you are talking about tools to deploy when panic occurs. If that's the case, you are somewhat right. If there is a panic, the only tool to use would be a bailout by rest-of-the-world where EU+??(Canada/Australia/China/Brazil)?? do emergency stabilization through money injection/treasury purchases.

So I don't think we disagree at all. I just wanted to stress that 1% scenarios should be always qualified by "very unlikely to occur". Otherwise people panic just because of possible panic. ;)



To: Spekulatius who wrote (39900)11/12/2010 9:29:11 AM
From: Mattyice  Respond to of 78748
 
Interesting topic... Anybody catch Jeremy Grantham's interview yesterday with money honey? Some pretty decent insight from a guy who has been right alot... If you have a few minutes its very inspiring at the least.

[url]http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1640401359&play=1[/url]