Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (289249)	11/5/2010 1:13:19 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

i'm saying we need a plan that doesn't assume eternal debt. i'm saying part of that plan is ending our ponzi debt based money supply. i'm saying part of that plan means the people control the money, not criminal banking enterprises (via law - to be determined by the people). i'm saying the criminals need to be prosecuted. i'm saying the insolvent banks need to be closed down. i'm saying the people's food shouldn't be inflated in order to pay criminal and insolvent bankers over 1% of GDP in bonuses. either we stop piling on debt, the lenders stop us from piling on debt or the dollar vanishes in value. i think the first option is the best - but if there were a plan in place i can see increasing the debt ceiling initially as part of that of that plan - but it includes all of the above.

To: tejek who wrote (289249)	11/5/2010 1:19:16 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

most people have no clue what a debt based money supply is and why it is criminal. beck was on his show taking about how the dollar was a promise... for the federal reserve to keep the dollar's value. that's pure disinfo. he knows he's misleading for his BIG Capital masters. the dollar is a debt note. it is a debt receipt. that dollar means someone is collecting interest by its very existence. here's a casino example. let's say there are two casinos - casino people and casino debt. casino people allows you to buy chips and play at the tables. casino debt requires you to BORROW CHIPS INTO EXISTENCE and the interest rate is 10% per hour. which casino will you play at? why? did the second casino's link to debt chips add any value whatsoever to the casino experience to offset the 10% per hour vig? casino debt is set up EXACTLY the same as our monetary system in design, the only differences being interest rate and time period. you are forced to live in "casino debt."