Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jafco who wrote (1570)	11/11/1997 2:10:00 PM
From: Ed Lamb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

TO ALL As a long time holder of Naxos and short (long) time holder of IPM many of us lurkers would like to know why you believe the long awaited report is due out this week. Relying on Taylor doesn't cut the mustard. Your pick the date contest showed what a bust your predicted news release dates were. The hyping of IPM is really no different than Charters views if you can't back up your release date with anything other than factual data. All views are greatly appreciated and all posts are great reading. Just inform us with some facts on the impending news release date. Thanks in advance elamb

To: Jafco who wrote (1570)	11/11/1997 2:45:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3744

They key to all the desert dirts is who took the samples and how were they handled. 800 selected samples is the key. Who selected them, where did they come from and how where they handled? Why did two companies including Inco take ore samples and find negligible values? If they were from company drilled samples and had been in a warehouse for a long time then anybody could be fooled by them. I am sure Normet in Australia had all the qualifications when they sayed and looked at the Bre-X samples. But they were not kosher were they? Did Thomas drill the property? Did he sequester the samples under lock and key?