Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (593062)	11/9/2010 9:39:23 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576329

"in which he provides yet more thoughts on God, death, and consciousness--three subjects of which he has absolutely no expertise." Does the author have enough expertise to question Hawking?....I think not.. "Apparently, in his mind, it is somehow more scientific to believe in "spontaneous creation" rather than divine creation. However, his statement is nothing more than philosophy masquerading as science. Because his hypothesis is just as untestable as any religious belief, it is well beyond the scope of science." Is the author arrogant enough to think he can scientifically challenge Hawking on any concept? He may not be able to follow Hawking from a religious point of view but he should quit there, he's out of his realm... FYI...Berezow just got his PhD in Microbiology, hardly a match for a Hawking..... Always remember...."religion begins where reason ends..."