Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: streetscraper who wrote (2965)	11/10/2010 4:28:50 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

Could be, but someone else must be writing the prose, judging by the content and style differences. Idiolect can be a very useful tool with a large enough sample, but there aren't enough posts yet. Just to illustrate how many people read this board - Johnik Share Wednesday, November 10, 2010 2:59:44 PM Re: scion post# 76119 [...[ By the way, thanks for keeping us up to date on the Kaplanis case. I appreciate it. (And no, scion, nobody is writing my posts for me.) :) siliconinvestor.com I suspect he also has some people posting what he writes for them. JOHNIK Share Monday, November 08, 2010 11:24:52 PM Re: BigGreen101 post# 75855 Post # of 75928 Hi BigGreen. The project doesn't need to sit idle pending DEC permitting. The permit application should be based on known and prospective emissions. An expansion of operations will not necessarily trigger a new application to the DEC. Of course, different obligations apply depending on the scope of the expansion, so I obviously can't comment on what requirements will necessarily be required of JBI in light of whatever expansions the company has in mind for the NY facility. I can, however, leave you with this (be sure to note the "operational flexibility" under part (b)): [...] siliconinvestor.com siliconinvestor.com