SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dybdahl who wrote (19957)11/11/2010 9:29:51 AM
From: Lane32 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42652
 
That's not much free market...

The government has a big chunk, for sure, and will have more when PPACA cranks up.

I question your calling the employment segment "socialized." Companies are free to choose if they offer and what they offer. They either self insure or buy from the market. Employees may or may not have multiple options but their employers are operating in market environment and do so on the employees' behalf. I wouldn't call health care "socialized" unless the coverage comes from the government. Employee coverage is called "group" as opposed to "individual" but each is market based as opposed socialized. Group insurance is simply a pricing mechanism of the market--you get a cheaper rate when you buy in bulk.



To: dybdahl who wrote (19957)11/11/2010 9:58:19 AM
From: i-node2 Recommendations  Respond to of 42652
 
>> That's not much free market...

Lane's chart is not correct, and her comment regarding employer sponsored plans is spot-on.

But it is difficult to call ANYTHING a REAL "free market" when government is in control of nearly half of the reimbursement system. It is a free market system to the beneficiary, but the payment system is anything BUT free market.

Which is the reason the only solution is to get government OUT of health care.