SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Little Joe who wrote (149539)11/11/2010 9:43:17 AM
From: Steve Lokness  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541658
 
What is this thing with Rail infrastructure? If it is such a wonderful thing, why can't it pay for itself?

Good question actually. IMM it is because oil gets a free ride. We fight wars to protect our oil supply which makes oil a subsidized product. Roads and bridges are often likewise subsidized through earmarks - think of Palin's road to nowhere. You won't go along with this but it is true nonetheless; GW and increased allergies and increased asthma are other unfunded cost to using oil.

BUT, the big reason is that since oil is a finite resource we will run out at some point. We can argue about when that will occur, but it will occur. So why not plan for the future now?



To: Little Joe who wrote (149539)11/11/2010 11:58:03 AM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541658
 
>>What is this thing with Rail infrastructure? If it is such a wonderful thing, why can't it pay for itself?<<

What is this thing with the US Highway System? If it was such a wonderful thing, why didn't it pay for itself?



To: Little Joe who wrote (149539)11/11/2010 2:52:17 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541658
 
<<What is this thing with Rail infrastructure? If it is such a wonderful thing, why can't it pay for itself?>> TransLink, the system in British Columbia does run operating surpluses.