Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (47159)	11/15/2010 9:33:21 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Axelrod & Other Amateurs New York Post, New York Post November 12, 2010 Meanwhile, in the White House, the left hand seems not to know what the far left hand is doing. Within hours yesterday, senior adviser David Axelrod gave contradictory statements on the question of extending the Bush-era tax cuts. In an early morning report, Axelrod indicated the White House realizes that the midterm elections confirmed a bipartisan consensus that all tax cuts should be extended -- regardless of income levels -- given a shaky economy: "We have to deal with the world as we find it," Axelrod told the Huffington Post. "The world of what it takes to get this done." He continued: "There are concerns [over multiple temporary extensions for the wealthy], but I don't want to trade away security for the middle class in order to make that point." Sounds smart: Recognize consensus. Deal with the world as it is. Introduce certainty into the economy. Except, Axelrod then did a 180-degree turn, later telling National Journal: "We're willing to discuss how we move forward. But we believe that it's imperative to extend the tax cuts for the middle class, and don't believe we can afford a permanent extension of tax cuts for the wealthy." (that is: taxpayers) What? It's not as if the issue suddenly jumped out of the bushes. It's been known since they were passed nine years ago that the tax cuts would expire at the end of 2010. So why is Axelrod talking out of both sides of his face? More to the point, is there a White House tax-cut policy? How can either businesses or individuals plan ahead when they have little idea how much money the federal government will let them keep? You'd think last week's midterms would have gotten that message across. Apparently not. nypost.com