Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (68271)	11/17/2010 3:00:53 AM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 218304

right, they are holding off because hk is not rich enough ;0) funny one

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (68271)	11/17/2010 3:27:43 AM
From: Arran Yuan	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218304

Beijing taking over HK? Hadn't Beijing taken over HK in 1997? Oh, yeah, only 1/5 if you consider printing presses there has 3 banks, only one is Chinese bank. Looking a further deeper, a clue is enough in this case, HK is left as it is because this serves the best interest of Beijing. BTW, Maoists could have taken over HK before the Korean War against the UN crime forces (anyone initiates a war is a criminal against humanity). Oops, another clue.