Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (68289)	11/17/2010 4:49:36 PM
From: TobagoJack	2 Recommendations Respond to of 218390

<<They could have, but it would have been an act of war against the UK, which was an ally of the US>> china took on us and uk in korea during same time, so what, as in what of it? china took on usa again in vietnam (read the pentagon papers since your mind is not disposed to hearing history from me), again, so what? in any case taking hk by taking kowloon and/or cutting off water permanently to hk would have been legally permitted under any laws to do with lease cancellation or cessation of supplier relationship - ipso, hk was deliberately allowed to be on own if you do not admit that, merely shows ignorance to a higher degree than i originally suspected