SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scrapps who wrote (8996)11/11/1997 5:07:00 PM
From: David Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22053
 
>>...ROK didn't say anything in that long release of FUD about the particulars of just what it is Bay Networks is doing wrong.

I won't swear to this, but I believe it's because they are running x2 and K56Flex inside the same chassis. I guess Rockwell can't stand the competition.



To: Scrapps who wrote (8996)11/11/1997 6:03:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 22053
 
Well Glenn ROK didn't say anything in that long release of FUD about the particulars of just what it is Bay Networks is doing wrong. Isn't Bay putting x2 in some of their equipment that also has K56Flex? Scrapps, I also noticed ROK never indicated how a license was violated. Bay's top end RAC will support 56K Flex or x2. Not both in the same RAC at the same time. I have no idea what their contract with Crockwell may be. Glenn


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News