Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (10034)	11/19/2010 4:20:04 PM
From: Solon	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

"So you think God digs up and tortures decayed flesh:" The point was that neither you NOR your imaginary unicorn can derive any such pleasure from the dead. There is nothing to torture and nothing to feel the pain. So your gleeful threats are vacuous and feckless. "I have never taken pleasure in Ayn Rand's ultimate destiny" As usual, you are a liar. You hate her with every part of your being because she represents Reason and Humanity, and that sickens you and sullies your superstitious world-view. And that is why you've conducted these vicious attacks against her decades after her death, when she cannot defend against your ruthless and raging malevolence. There are thousands of posts on SI to show exactly how you think and what it is you feel. "Unlike you, wishing cancer and death on me:" "You are a liar twice in the same post (not unusual for you). I've never wished any such thing on you, nor on anyone else. "I have consistently WARNED you of the consequences of your continued blasphemous rebellion against God, with your best interests in mind." Please stop the supercilious tone and the phony sentiment. I don't think you are moral. I don't think you are bright. And I don't think your superstitious opinions are worth a damn--not to me nor to anyone else who has ever walked or talked or thrown a rock. "there is no atheist "code" to compare anything to" Taking your stupid pills again, eh?! LOL! Disbelieving in a supernatural being is no more a moral statement than a fondness for reason or a dislike of olives! Lord love a duck! "moral crimes deserve to be punished" Duh! Thanks for your contribution! "Interesting to see you insinuate your own moral superiority to God." What are you talking about? I asked you "Which one of us is getting a better moral education??" I pointed out that my moral teachers were benefactors of humanity who have helped greatly in the civilizing process. And I pointed out that your moral teachers were ALL extremely IMMORAL--and some of the worst examples of immorality that humanity has ever had the extreme misfortune to encounter: Rape, genocide, racism, slavery, tribalism, torture, human sacrifice, degradation--and an unrelenting barbaric ignorance. You name it. You cannot point to ONE SINGLE CREATURE in your book of morals who would be welcome at the table of a civil and moral person. Would YOU have supper with Joshua? With Lot? With Moses? With Yahweh? With Aaron? With Jesus? With the talking donkey? With the big fish that had an efficiency suite in his tummy? Then why do you exalt these terrible people (and ridiculous creatures) as moral teachers??