Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Rat's Nest - Chronicles of Collapse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (11468)	11/19/2010 10:34:37 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24235

How Much Energy Does It Take to Get Our Energy? When you look closely, not all energy sources are created equal in terms of the amount of net energy they produce. By John Gulland - December 2010/January 2011 These bars represent the estimated maximum energy return on investment of both renewables and fossil fuels. Oil's ratio has declined over time with the increased difficulty of bringing it to consumers. SOURCE: CHARLES A. SH. HALL AND JOHN W. DAY JR/AMERICAN SOCIETY, GRAPH: MATTHEW T. STALLBAUMER The future of our finite supply of fossil fuels is uncertain at best, and development of new energy options continues to gain speed. It’s likely we’ll use a combination of renewable energies and fossil fuels for the forseeable future. If you listen to some representatives of the alternative energy industry, you’d think every renewable fuel source out there is the No. 1 candidate to meet the world’s future energy needs — the most qualified to replace oil, coal and natural gas. So, which type of renewable energy will provide us with the highest net gain in energy? Energy return on energy invested is more commonly stated as energy return on investment (EROI). The term was coined by Charles Hall, professor of environmental science and forestry at the State University of New York (SUNY), and is presented as a ratio of energy produced to the energy consumed during production. An energy source that yields positive net energy has an EROI ratio of more than 1:1. Anything less than that constitutes an energy sink, or net loss. Focusing on the Future It takes energy to find, extract, refine and transport energy commodities. The energy cost of energy wasn’t a topic worthy of study throughout most of the era of fossil fuels because coal, oil and natural gas were so accessible and easy to deliver that their EROI ratios were very high. However, no longer can an oil company drill a hole on easily accessible, vacant land and get a gusher. Although new discoveries are announced regularly, most are small and many are difficult and increasingly expensive to extract. Consider the deep water oil wells in the Gulf of Mexico, the frozen shorelines of the Arctic Ocean, the tar sands in Alberta, Canada, or the shale oil deposits in Wyoming as examples. Oil’s EROI remains high compared with most renewables, but it’s continually declining. (Note the changing EROI values of oil in 1930, 1970, 2000 and 2005 shown in red in the graph above.) And, because the production and consumption of energy always has environmental impacts, the more energy that must be invested to produce usable energy, the greater the environmental cost of that source. A cautionary example is the recent situation with corn ethanol. According to research from Hall and SUNY graduate student David Murphy, corn ethanol’s EROI is just barely positive on average at 1.1:1. This is the root of much of the controversy surrounding ethanol: Critics rightly wonder if it’s worthwhile to put so many resources into an energy source that yields such a small rate of return. The SUNY researchers indicate that a fuel should obtain a ratio of more than 5:1 to be worth pursuing. In contrast, Hall and John Day, ecologist and professor emeritus of oceanography at Louisiana State University, estimate hydropower’s potential return at roughly 40:1. The study of EROI ratios and the conclusions drawn from it are sometimes controversial because the outcome depends so much on the underlying assumptions. Hall adds that net energy numbers are hard to pinpoint because nearly all data on energy use in the U.S. economy is usually recorded in terms of dollars, not energy. Still, Hall says, “EROI can be used to help evaluate which alternative fuels are likely to be the most viable economically in the future, especially if appropriate improvements are made in the quality of the inputs and outputs. There is consistency in the different analyses when the same boundaries are used.” He warns that we must be prepared for the possibility of a future with far less net energy, because most, if not all, our current alternative energy options have low EROI compared with that of fossil fuels. The concept of EROI is one of the best tools to help us understand why the price of energy is relentlessly rising. Energy is no longer cheap, and likely never will be again. Anyone who has cut, split and stacked a cord of wood knows there is an energy cost of producing a fuel. In the case of firewood, it’s mostly human energy — a truly renewable resource. But the next time you hear about an energy source that will solve all our energy needs, think about the input required to bring it to the masses. Let’s focus our development efforts on the renewable fuels that will pack the most (net) punch. You can learn more about EROI at The Oil Drum website. motherearthnews.com