SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Travel Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (968)11/19/2010 12:48:45 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 1521
 
AHAHAHAHAA...just TRY and have a TSA clown ask you pertinent questions and have enough sense to make sense out of your answers. ain't gonna happen...GED's at best
voices.washingtonpost.com
probably won't be good for more than today



To: TimF who wrote (968)11/19/2010 12:53:07 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 1521
 
latimes.com



To: TimF who wrote (968)11/21/2010 2:57:45 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 1521
 
Lubed, but still not ready
Airport full-body scans and pat-downs amount to legalized sexual harassment

By Jennifer Hadley 11/18/2010
I rarely write about air travel in this column, because, frankly, I don’t fly all that often. Although I am terrified of flying, I will still take to the scary skies from time to time, if it’s for a good reason. So I took off from Burbank last week, sedative free. I’ve traded in the pre-flight sedatives for a glass of wine before my flights, regardless of how early in the day I depart. But I don’t drink until I’m safely through security and waiting at a bar near my gate. However, this may have to change due to new TSA security screening methods. I may very well have to start chugging booze before I even get to the airport in order to endure the humiliation of new screening procedures.

Thanks to that jerk who tried to hide a bomb in his underwear last Christmas on a flight to Detroit, everyone boarding a plane these days may be gifted with having an essentially nude photo taken of them by the TSA. At 65 airports, full-body scanning machines (totaling 152 millimeter wave unit scanners and 189 Backscatter scanners) are now being used. And the total number of these machines using advanced imaging technology is expected to grow to more than 1,000 by the end of next year.

I won’t get into all of the specifics, but in short, here is how they work. You stand in a booth, your body is scanned and an image of your naked body is viewed on a computer by a TSA employee working in a remote area of the airport. Therefore, according to the TSA, you shouldn’t be shy because the employee looking at you naked can’t see your face. Moreover, the public shouldn’t be concerned about privacy since the TSA is adamant that the images cannot be stored or saved or printed. This is confounding to me since I did a quick search and found dozens of images online immediately.

It should be noted, though, that having your body photographed for a stranger to view is optional. But the alternative isn’t much more appealing. Should you refuse to submit to a full- body scan (maybe because of the radiation you’re being exposed to, or because you’re pregnant, or because you don’t love strangers seeing you in your birthday suit), there is another equally dehumanizing procedure you can opt for. This is referred to as the pat-down. And boy has the pat-down come a long way.

In days of yore, a pat-down required the agent frisking you to use the back of their hands and to avoid sensitive areas of the body. Not so anymore, travelers. Agents can cop a feel on any area of your body they wish, and there is nothing you can do about it. It’s legal sexual harassment.

I’m not a particularly shy person, but I’m also not clamoring to let a woman I don’t know grope me. Moreover, in my 33 years I’ve also managed to avoid having strangers photograph me naked. But it seems that despite my best attempts to avoid these less than pleasant experiences, I no longer have any rights to my own privacy. So if I’m going to be subjected to these intrusive measures, I figure I won’t mind as much if I’ve had a glass or three of wine prior, so you know, I’m all relaxed.

Unfortunately, there are a whole bunch of people who can’t or won’t be able to loosen up a bit before they are man-handled. This includes — oh, right off the top of my, head — pilots. So it’s no surprise to me that the US Airline Pilots Association, which represents 5,000 US Airways pilots, and the Allied Pilots Association, which represents 11,000 American Airlines pilots, are up in arms over the new screening procedures. Granted, their point of contention has more to do with the potential radiation risks caused by advanced imaging technology, but they still don’t like these new procedures any more than I do.

So to the pilots, and to other non-drinkers, you have my empathy, because I know the only way I’ll be able to tolerate these intrusive tactics is if I’m half-crocked before having to endure them.
Contact Jennifer Hadley at jmhadley624@yahoo.com.



To: TimF who wrote (968)11/21/2010 3:40:39 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 1521
 
already cracking in this ridiculous policy

TSA chief: Screening will be minimally invasive

By JIM ABRAMS
Associated Press

(AP:WASHINGTON) The head of the federal agency responsible for airport security says screening procedures should be as minimally invasive as possible, shifting his position that there would be no change in controversial scans and pat-downs.

The head of the Transportation Security Administration, John Pistole, said in a statement Sunday afternoon that the agency is constantly evaluating and adapting security measures and there is a continual process of refinement and adjustment to ensure air safety.

Pistole's statement toned down his earlier stance, expressed on a Sunday news show, that in the interest of safety passengers would have to put up with sometimes invasive and uncomfortable screening.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

WASHINGTON (AP) _ Air travelers buoyed by President Barack Obama's request for his national security team to consider less intrusive airport screenings shouldn't expect anything different at airports soon. "No, we're not changing the policies," the head of the agency responsible for airport security said Sunday.

"It really comes down to what is that balance between privacy and security," said John Pistole of the Transportation Security Administration. The current threat level is too high to lessen the use of full body scans and intimate pat-downs that some passengers undergo at some airports, he said on CNN's "State of the Union."

Those measures don't apply to Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who said security experts "are looking for ways to diminish the impact on the traveling public." She, for one, wouldn't like to submit to a security pat-down.

"Not if I could avoid it. No. I mean, who would?" Clinton told CBS' "Face the Nation" in an interview broadcast Sunday.

Pistole said the ingenuity and determination of terrorists trying to bring down an airplane ruled out changes in screening policies that have been assailed by some passengers as an invasion of privacy.

"Clearly it's invasive, it's not comfortable," Pistole said of the scans and pat-downs. But, he added, "if we are to detect terrorists, who have again proven innovative and creative in their design and implementation of bombs that are going to blow up airplanes and kill people, then we have to do something that prevents that."

Rep. John Mica, R-Fla. who is set to become Transportation Committee chairman when Republicans take over the House in January, differed with the approach.

"I don't think the rollout was good and the application is even worse. This does need to be refined. But he's saying it's the only tool and I believe that's wrong," Mica, a longtime critic of the TSA, said separately on the CNN program.

With the peak traveling season nearing, air travelers are protesting new requirements at some U.S. airports that they must pass through full-body scanners that produce a virtually naked image. The screener, who sits in a different location, does not see the face of the person being screened and does not know the traveler's identity.

Those who refuse to go through the scanners are subject to thorough pat-downs that include agency officials touching the clothed genital areas of passengers.

Obama said in Lisbon on Saturday that he had asked TSA official whether there's a less intrusive way to ensure travel safety. "I understand people's frustrations," he said, adding that he had told the TSA that "you have to constantly refine and measure whether what we're doing is the only way to assure the American people's safety."

Clinton, appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press," said she thought "everyone, including our security experts, are looking for ways to diminish the impact on the traveling public" and that "striking the right balance is what this is about."

Pistole was shown videos of people being patted down where the screeners touched the breasts of a woman, felt into the pants of another person and felt the crotch of a man. He said all three cases were proper and that the gloves of the screener who felt inside the pants were then tested for explosive trace residue.

A Nigerian man was accused last Christmas of trying to set off a bomb hidden in his underwear aboard a flight from Amsterdam.

Pistole added that very few people receive the pat-down. People who go through the new advanced imaging machines available at some 70 airports are usually not subject to pat-downs, he said.

Pistole said that while watch lists and other intelligence sources help the TSA pick out travelers who might pose greater risks, rules against profiling mean that some people who are less of a risk, such as the elderly or the disabled, must sometimes undergo pat-downs.

"I want to be sympathetic to each of the negative experiences. We've had extensive outreach to a number of different disability community groups, a number of different outreach efforts to try to say, how can we best work with those in your community to effect security while respecting your dignity and privacy," he said.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., appearing on CBS, said Congress would hold hearings on the "very controversial" issue of how to strike the right balance. Asked how he would feel about submitting to a pat-down, Hoyer said: "I don't think any of us feel that the discomfort and the delay is something that we like, but most people understand that we've got to keep airplanes safe."

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



To: TimF who wrote (968)11/22/2010 8:26:54 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1521
 
just read the comments below this story! WOW
finance.yahoo.com