Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (36803)	11/20/2010 5:19:50 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 46821

Interesting replies by Mq and WLD both. My point, however, goes to the inevitable requirement to reach an equilibrium between supply and demand, it was not about the absolute value and/or need for additional intelligence. I wrote about the effects of a hypothetical tsunami of innovation and disruption, which was not to suggest that more intelligence wasn't needed. Indeed, one of the greatest challenges to our collective intelligence going forward may just be the need to address the very dilemma of which I wrote. And that was: too many producers of innovative disruptive goods and services -- both real and virtual, and both concrete and ethereal, where very few of the above are geared to sustaining life's real needs -- and not enough demand and buying power on the part of remaining consumers, who, in addition to being a minority in this hypothetical scenario, also happen to be less productive in terms of creating innovative and disruptive goods and services as well. ------