Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (68476)	11/21/2010 4:54:07 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218055

If there's no spark, there's no fire. Yea.. but they don't know what the ORIGINAL ignition source was. It could be electrical, or friction.. And from what I read, the overpressure from that blast makes it unlikely that anyone survived. If they had, they'd be crawling out right now. So the question is whether it merits risking more lives until they have a better grasp on what caused the original blast and whether it might occur again. I know if I were in that mine as a survivor, I would totally understand their caution. My life is not worth the loss of another individual. I'd just have to accept my fate and the fact that the blast probably "juiced" all my internal organs and I'm not long for this world. But that's just my perspective. Hawk