Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (593873)	11/22/2010 7:55:40 AM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583492

Now you're suggesting Ghailani wasn't guilty of the murder charges. After all, he WAS found not guilty of murder by a civilian court .... after the judge excluded most of the evidence against him. Under our criminal justice system, the accused are INNOCENT until proven guilty, so Ghailani is legally INNOCENT of murder as far as the law ic concerned. Then after casting doubt on the case against Ghailani you go on to insist the Feds would not let him walk even if he were found not guilty on ALL charges anyway, that they'd hold him "for the duration". IOW you think they should hold a man forever when he's been found not guilty by a jury? So why do you think we should even have any trials at all?