Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: grusum who wrote (293475)	11/24/2010 1:31:13 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

>>you claimed that the media has 'hijacked' me. please explain logically how that happened. how do you know that i've been hijacked? what did i used to believe that i don't believe now?<< by confining you to the false two party system - both of which are controlled by BIG Capital and are used to assault your rights, wealth and labor. free minds would never vote for liars that claim to to be the lesser of two tyrannies... free minds would vote for people not beholden to the the rothschilds, rockefellers, the fed, big agra, big pharam, big military, etc... free minds would never elect palin. or obama. or bush. or clinton. the hijack refers to the media convincing to vote against your self interest. >>and no doubt soros would love to elect the most liberal candidate. i'll vote for the most conservative candidate no matter who it is.<< you just admitted to voting for the bet controlled establishment party candidate. >>i supported bob barr. but as usual you jump to incorrect conclusions based on no evidence.<< i did. mea culpa... >>america needs honest, honorable conservatives in the worst way.<< why? if people will vote for palin, why do they deserve better? all we do is vote for the face that smiles back at us while our rights are raped and our treasure pillaged. >>we may already be doomed no matter who gets elected.<< doesn't justify playing into the criminal system, imho. >>you don't know that palin would do anything to 'butcher' our rights.<< yes i do. i know who supports her. i knew obama was a fraud because i know who supported him. i had so many people tell me i didn't know what obama would do, too... but i was right about almost everything - in fact, he was worse than i though he would be because the typical democrat are as worthless as the typical republican when it comes to forcing their candidate to be decent. republicans should have marched on bush and democrats need to march on obama. >>doesn't matter. there are too many of us that are going to resist. you and i don't agree on much, but i suspect we are both going to resist.<< let's see... they steal $30 trillion (figure how many slaves will support that debt...) and don't even have to take a haircut on the bonds of their completely corrupt and failed businesses. they criminally blew the bubble, they criminally rated their toxic trash, they criminally insured it, the committed untold securities fraud (surprise - the MBS have to mortgage backing!) and on and on and on and... nothing. freaking nothing. yes, people will resist, but they don't care. they have the police state all set to go and take care of the rebel rousers. most of the homeless and hungry will take the helping hand from the goons who criminally busted them b/c they will have no idea what happened - too much nfl and dancing with the stars to bother. >>look at the latest election. america is waking up.<< some good things happened in the election. BUT NOT A SINGLE PERSON ELECTED IS DEMANDING THAT THE CRIMINALS BE SENT TO JAIL FOR THEIR CRIMES - PROBABLY NUMBERING OVER 10 MILLION FELONIES. in short, they are bought and paid for, too... just not to the same level. the difference is quantitative, not qualitative.