Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SteveF who wrote (3351)	11/25/2010 8:59:33 AM
From: scion	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53574

Look, your posts are too cryptic for me to even respond to them. I don't work for the SEC so I don't know when or how the SEC was notified about anything. If you would like to bring your posts within the context of the discussion at issue, then please elaborate as to what your point is and how that relates to a proper interpretation of the filings in question. Johnik scion Share Thursday, November 25, 2010 8:47:52 AM Re: ergo sum post# 78530 Post # of 78547 As Moore is no longer registered with the PCAOB, you may not include Moore’s audit reports or consents in your filings with the Commission made on or after August 27, 2009. If Moore audited a year that you are required to include in your filings with the Commission, then you should engage a firm that is registered with the PCAOB to re-audit that year. [...] siliconinvestor.com ergo sum Share Wednesday, November 24, 2010 10:39:39 PM Re: Johnik post# 78529 Post # of 78547 BUT with the Pipe and the massive PR campaign and all the calls to Nasdaq one would exect people were paying attention. When did the SEC get notified about the filing problems? 8-K/A Documents [Amend]Current report, items 1.01, 2.01, 2.02, 3.02, 5.06, and 9.01 Acc-no: 0001213900-10-000306 (34 Act) Size: 325 KB 2010-01-27 000-52444 10550640 8-K Documents Current report, items 1.01, 2.02, 3.02, and 9.01 Acc-no: 0001213900-10-000259 (34 Act) Size: 32 KB 2010-01-22 000-52444 10541845 D Documents Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities, item 06 Acc-no: 0001213900-10-000257 (33 Act) Size: 7 KB 2010-01-22 021-138093 10541772 8-K Documents Current report, items 5.02 and 9.01 Acc-no: 0001213900-10-000110 (34 Act) Size: 48 KB 2010-01-11 000-52444 10520208 8-K Documents Current report, items 2.01 and 9.01 Acc-no: 0001213900-10-000042 (34 Act) Size: 40 KB 2010-01-06 000-52444 10510848 8-K Documents Current report, items 5.02 and 9.01 Acc-no: 0001213900-10-000007 (34 Act) Size: 50 KB 2010-01-04 000-52444 10501032 siliconinvestor.com Johnik Share Wednesday, November 24, 2010 11:10:04 PM Re: ergo sum post# 78530 Post # of 78547 Look, your posts are too cryptic for me to even respond to them. I don't work for the SEC so I don't know when or how the SEC was notified about anything. If you would like to bring your posts within the context of the discussion at issue, then please elaborate as to what your point is and how that relates to a proper interpretation of the filings in question. If your post is unrelated to those filings, then please create a separate thread identifying your concerns. siliconinvestor.com