To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (293776 ) 11/26/2010 2:00:57 AM From: grusum Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849 alright, let's nail this down. ok -----do you expect palin to... 1. rescind the patriot act? 2. end TSA's assault on the Constitution? 3. End banker bailouts? 4. Turn the justice department loose on the banker criminals starting with the bankers that bribed the jefferson county officials who were convicted of being bribed? just like i thought. you have no evidence that palin is a crook. ------when palin continues and builds on the tyranny of bush and obama... then you will know. when purple wombats dance on the moon... then you will know. -------just like all the obama hopium people told me i didn't know obama was a total fraud. yes, i know. you're the only one that knew he was a fraud. -------now, when i'm right about palin, too, then you will know why i say you've been duped. right, then i'll know. --------btw, i fully expect the controllers to, at some point, to end the "QE" and other dollar debt emitting operations and drive the depression angle to bust america... palin may well help to orchestrate that. the fooled will think this is the fix... it isn't. the banks have already been given about $30 trillion in guarantees and palin will pony up (most of it, if not all of it). the people will get nothing - ss busted, banks busted, fdic busted, etc... you're a sooth sayer.. --------watch and continue to wonder. i'm watching and wondering. --------palin has already shown the constitution isn't really important to her... false. --------http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_rW2BfRl9E "We need a commander in chief, NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSOR LECTURING US FROM THE LECTERN." why? that d*mn document gets in the way of the AGENDA! she was sarcastically referring to obama acting more like professor than a commander in chief. she was right. --------note how she assaults people who *actually* holds the constitution as the *actual* law of the land as being removed and DEFINITELY not able to be a commander in chief. i'm not sure what you're saying in the above sentence. but it doesn't matter, you presented zero evidence that palin is a crook.