Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ddl who wrote (25494)	11/11/1997 6:39:00 PM
From: Karl Zetmeir	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

I'm not sure where this wording came from (an Annual Report?) ... but I think it's a year or more old. At that time I think BD was supervising the coc materials. I don't think this language is either relevant or accurate for the coc samples that are currently being processed. I was in AZ in Oct/96 along with some other internet buddies ... and the protocol I believe this paragraph was referring to was in place at that time.

To: ddl who wrote (25494)	11/11/1997 6:46:00 PM
From: Furry Otter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Hello Denis Let me take your two questions in reverse order 2) Does it mean to say that BD only evaluated the procedure used by IPM? It means they did this at least. 1) Does is mean to say that BD supervised the procedure from start to finish It may, or may not. BD could have reviewed the procedure on paper only, and made recommendations which were agreed to, and that's it. Or, BD could have actually watched how things were done, and made recommendations, and then watched again to ensure they were, in fact, implemented. Or, they could have reviewed the procedures on paper, and then watched the procedure with the recommendations implemented to ensure that they were, in fact, employed. I think they did at least this third scenario, because of the reference to verification in the last sentence. BTW, I just read Karl's post, and I agree that whatever the above is, it does not pertain to the COC we are currently waiting for a report on, which I understand was BD going out to the desert, digging up a sample, processing it, and sending it out for assays, as opposed to watching IPM do same and making recommendations about security procedures. Regards, Otter