Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (10543)	12/6/2010 5:57:55 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

“What the writer said was true“ What I said was true. The writer’s “true” statement was irrelevant and made no argument of any kind. IT is not a constitutional right under the US constitution“ You are simply repeating what he said, that which no-one has disagreed with. “But stating facts contrary to liberal opinion is heresy it seems. Abortion and gay sex are holy rites for liberals these days.“ Those gratuitous remarks have nothing to do with the substance of what he or I posted. Please try to keep a bit of focus. We don’t benefit from enduring your tales of personal enmity against “liberals“ and whatever else hides in your closets to cause you such abject dismay. “society communicates that message in innumerable ways“ No, it doesn’t. Its the problem liberals have with responsibility.“ Hard for you to focus on this post, eh? “It may be for mothers and families, but doctors? Not likely.“ Doctors can’t have an abortion?? Is that in the Constitution?? No reason to think that.“ Yes, there is. That was a mature sentimenet on his part“ No, it wasn’t. It was immature and extremely disrespectful. It could only have originated in a labyrinth of obscene ignorance. However, I can understand why you would post the mangled “ideas” of such a person.