Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas G. Busillo who wrote (23868)	11/11/1997 10:58:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 53903

>>Maybe I don't understand the concept of "price objective", but if "objective" is synonymous with "goal" and the goal was to get clients out 55-60, not just have the stock go to 55-60, and he didn't (since MU never got back to 55-60 after his downgrade), then I'd argue he actually failed in his objective if you believe the premise that Kurlak doesn't tip his hand is valid.<< tom, tom, tom. hurlcrap's objective was to get himself and mutha meryl out at $55+. he did that, imho. as for his clients and the general(ly stupid) public, f*ck 'em. he needed some dope to buy those shares for ridiculous prices. hey, he didn't make 'em do it. they were dumb all by themselves...