SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (10582)12/6/2010 6:29:47 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
I figured it for a lie, but I had to be sure.
I am unamused by his need to do "God's work" in a demonstrably and obviously icky manner. Ya'd think his certainty of being called to judgment someday soon would make him more circumspect.

There are religious scholars in my circle of friends whose persons and ideas I respect. All those people are capable of winning AND losing arguments. More to the point ... they are civil regardless how the debate is running.
Jmo, js

ps nice save on "puissant", lol!

<edit> I am ordinarily loath to post in the third person. However in this case I found the provocation to be ... egregious.



To: Solon who wrote (10582)12/7/2010 3:28:48 AM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
"I told him dozens of times I did not personally endorse, support, or advocate any perversions such as pederasty"

And yet you repeatedly posted this statement: "I said I had no objection to YOUR pederasty." Message 26607214

"to discredit and harm me for my staunch advocacy..."

LOL: but I thought you said that you're not an advocate? My mistake: you're a "STAUNCH ADVOCATE" and moralist, extraordinaire!