Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (96671)	12/11/2010 2:20:40 PM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224744

it went down under Truman and Eisenhower because of less spending. No one paid those high tax rates. There were too many deductions and tax breaks then. You could buy LPs with high tax loses and use them, all interest was deductible. None of my relatives paid those rates and none of their friends did

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (96671)	12/11/2010 3:00:36 PM
From: tonto	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224744

The debt went up every year. That is a indisputable fact. You were wrong...again.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (96671)	12/11/2010 6:23:58 PM
From: chartseer	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224744

In real terms as a percent of GDP sounds like a conflict. Was it in real terms or as a percentage of GDP. Did the debt go down in real terms or did the debt go down as a percentage of GDP. Or was it both? Remember never let the facts get in your way. Will you ever respond about the merits of the billions sent to Brazil for their deep water off shore drilling and did Soros have any connection to the Brazilian oil company? Isn't it odd you do not have any comment? freerepublic.com comrade chartseer