SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (96825)12/13/2010 1:34:16 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
DOWN ken DOWN DOWN DOWN!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (96825)12/13/2010 1:38:03 PM
From: d[-_-]b2 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224750
 
The holding is not the point - the law is written poorly and does not account for portions being found unconstitutional - so if any part is found unconstitutional the entire bill is void.

Pay attention.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (96825)12/13/2010 1:56:00 PM
From: d[-_-]b4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 
If one part of Obamacare goes down then the whole law is unconstitutional . There was no severability clause added to the many pages of the legislation. [normally stated as such : "notwithstanding any provision of this act being found unconstitutional, the rest of the act shall continue to be in force."]