Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wayners who wrote (42009)	12/13/2010 10:57:47 PM
From: John	5 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

The illegal alien African Muslim sounds like an angry, militant Black radical! Obama vows to fight Republicans -- next year content.usatoday.com excerpt: "I will be happy to see the Republicans test whether or not I'm itching for a fight on a whole range of issues," Obama said last week. "I suspect they will find I am. And I think the American people will be on my side on a whole bunch of these fights." --- Do you see what I mean? He comes across like an affirmative action imbecile who happens to be an angry, militant Black radical. I've never heard a president speak in a shuck-and-jive argumentative manner like that. He sounds like an angry, militant Black radical with an ax to grind. He sounds that way because that's what he is. -ng- As HoneyBee and others have suggested a few times, Barry/Barack has disgraced, shamed, soiled, tarnished, and otherwise ruined the office of POTUS by his bizarre and radical actions. It's no wonder that his fellow Democrats in Congress have abandoned him and are routinely saying things like, "Fck the president" and "I don't know where the fck Obama is." He's a crazy, very dangerous angry, militant Black radical!

To: Wayners who wrote (42009)	12/14/2010 7:04:20 AM
From: Bill	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

Wayne, the judge ruled the Wickard decision, which imposed govt control over what farmers could feed cattle, was not a precedent for justification under the commerce clause. I was amused how MSNBC and the WH downplayed the significance of this decision last night, saying two other judges had ruled the opposite. However, unlike the other politically motivated rulings, this one was a summary judgment which has the potential of being appealed directly to the USSC.