SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (297759)12/14/2010 12:08:01 AM
From: John ChenRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
"One party fights for the poor and one party fights for the rich."

Both parties always chest-pounding for the middle class.

Awesome.



To: koan who wrote (297759)12/14/2010 12:08:48 AM
From: Skeeter BugRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
>>One party fights for the poor and one party fights for the rich.<<

that's the propaganda...

what is this guy doing by obama's car?

emptysuit.wordpress.com

this while the bankers get TRILLIONS to prop up their criminal operation to steal homes from americans when they don't have the paperwork required to LEGALLY prove standing.

but when the democrats are in power, the poor get to beg and the criminals in wall street don't need standing to steal their homes, either - the law be d*mned.

you are incredibly slow, koan - i think they call it stopped.



To: koan who wrote (297759)12/14/2010 1:03:46 AM
From: Broken_ClockRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
One party fights for the poor to go to war and one party fights for the rich to stay home.

Which party is that?



To: koan who wrote (297759)12/14/2010 8:30:58 AM
From: Pogeu MahoneRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Koan
I respect you however your politics is living in the past.
Dems sold out to the same players that the repubs did.
I see the dems fighting hard for the poor(so f`ing sarcastic)