SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Smith who wrote (152275)12/14/2010 9:14:14 AM
From: Suma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541854
 
I don't want to purchase car insurance either but I have to by law.

I don't want homeowners especially when all I can get is the State Run Fund which costs and arm and leg but which never pays when a claim is made.

Here in Florida it is not easy to subvert having the coverages that are mandatory...

Any ideas how we can get a Federal Judge to rule about
having to have these things ?

By the way I have had good insurance companies and never a claim. Have paid thousands and thousands of dollars in insurance and all of these companies just drop you if your home is older than having been built in 1994. That is my predicament.



To: Paul Smith who wrote (152275)12/14/2010 10:37:52 AM
From: Steve Lokness  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541854
 
The Supreme Court will decide if the government can mandate citizen purchases with 100% forced compliance. That power does not appear in the Constitution.

Maybe, but then how do you explain this;

Social Security refers to the federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News