Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (69626)	12/14/2010 3:35:30 PM
From: carranza2	Respond to of 217942

"huge and profitable tax flow." Should have said "cash flow."

To: carranza2 who wrote (69626)	12/15/2010 4:43:11 AM
From: Maurice Winn	3 Recommendations Respond to of 217942

C2, I don't have to change my mind to agree that if there were no people in the USA using Mexican suppliers' drugs then the Mexicans would have to get other criminal activities to do. If there were no people in the USA, the problem would also be solved. If no drugs could get into the USA, that would fix the problem too. If they all switched to Afghanistan opium with no prohibition on using Afghan opium and marijuana, that would reduce the problem of Mexicans shooting each other over USA drug sales too. We agree that if there was no market, ipso facto there would be no suppliers; also prima facie, casus belli, infra vide, ultra vires, caveat emptor, habeas corpus, argo germinus, fendo compensado, et pluribum unis too. But having agreed that there would be no market, so what? Removing all humans from the USA won't be popular in the USA. What are you suggesting follows from the trite conclusion that if there were no buyers there'd be no sellers. Mqurice