To: Schmedley who wrote (2861 ) 11/15/1997 12:30:00 AM From: SteveG Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12468
<If so, perhaps it is a more intelligent investment than WCII -they have managed to lose -6.75 per share in the last 12 months alone! > Let's be clear here Schmed - this loss is NOT from R&D costs combined with a distinct lack of revenue streams (unlike companies in OTHER threads), but from capital and deployment outlays of an income producing and inarguably valuable wireless CLEC business. <Kinda makes you wonder what qualifies as HYPE and what qualifies as HOOPLA.> I don't hype ANY stock, Schmed. Risk abounds. But I does my research and I makes my picks. Even such, I am a trader first and investor second. I maintain [USUALLY :( ] a sell discipline to limit losses. I don't get married to stocks, though if I feel a stock is desrving, I may give it more downside room to a limit. I took profits on 1/2 of my WCII as it failed to hold 28. The other I rode down, as was prepared to bail the balance a bit below my purchase price - more on general market and technical concerns than on WCII fundamentals. I remain cautious, but in hindsight would have liked to pick up more on the way up recently. I think the story is real, but caution everyone to do their homework. I don't have time (or interest) in presenting all of my rationale at this time. <I think I'll exercise a little patience THIS TIME until real earnings are within the visible spectrum- lest some well informed voice of reason scares me out of my stock just as I should be getting in. Perhaps this is not the time to jump aboard an already crowded ship.> I commend you for your discipline and conservatism on a stock whose story you may not know that well, and wish you great success in those you do (and even in those you do not). Steve