SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (97012)12/17/2010 10:34:19 AM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224845
 
Kenny, I think Pelosi should run for President. Her platform could be..."You have to elect me first to find out what my agenda might be".



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (97012)12/17/2010 10:35:40 AM
From: chartseer1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224845
 
your article left out that major detail. Could that be because that article is biased.
My link is mussing.

comrade chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (97012)12/17/2010 10:41:08 AM
From: JakeStraw2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224845
 
A high corporate tax rate is a drag on an economy. It affects a country's competitiveness as the steep rates chase away investment. Why pour capital into a factory or tech business in the U.S. when you could build either one in South Korea, where the corporate tax rate is nearly 40% lower and the work force is just as educated, skilled and motivated, if not more so?
investors.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (97012)12/17/2010 11:17:45 AM
From: lorne2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224845
 
Gees ken..hussein is not going to like this..nope not one bit.

Anti-illegals activist to target voter fraud
By Valerie Richardson
-
The Washington Times
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
washingtontimes.com

Outside of Kansas, Kris Kobach is best known as an expert on immigration issues. He's the author of Arizona's anti-illegal-immigration law, a longtime counsel to the Immigration Law Reform Institute and a hero within the border-security movement.

Inside Kansas, he wears another hat entirely. He's the newly elected secretary of state, having ousted Democratic incumbent Chris Biggs by a margin of 59 percent to 37 percent.

Why would someone who's devoted his career to fighting illegal immigration want to become chief vote-counter for the state of Kansas? Suffice it to say that Mr. Kobach devoted his campaign to one issue, and that issue was voter fraud - and it too has an immigration angle.

The specter of illegal immigrants casting votes in U.S. elections has long frustrated Republicans, and Mr. Kobach is now poised to do something about it. Even before he's sworn in, he's already hard at work drafting voter-fraud legislation that he says will be most the comprehensive in the nation.

"This will be head and shoulders above anything any state has ever done to secure the voting process," he said. "My hope is to create a model with regard to stopping voter fraud that can be used in other states, like we did in Arizona" with immigration.

His election comes at a professional cost. He likely will lose his tenured seat at the University of Missouri at Kansas City law school in order to take the secretary of state's job, given that "a leave of absence usually doesn't last four years," he said.

Even so, Mr. Kobach, 44, said it wouldn't have been enough to draft the Kansas voter-fraud bill as an outside consultant, as was the case when he wrote Senate Bill 1070, the Arizona immigration bill.

"For election laws in Kansas and most states, if the secretary isn't pushing for major reform to happen, then it isn't going to happen. It takes more than a few legislators," Mr. Kobach said. "You really have to have a secretary of state pushing for it, especially with legislation this groundbreaking."

Kansas lawmakers attempted to enact a voter-fraud bill in 2008, but it was vetoed by Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, a Democrat. In November, however, Sen. Sam Brownback, a Republican, was elected governor on a platform that included combating voter fraud.

Mr. Kobach's plan is threefold. He wants to require photo identification at the time of voting, to make proof of citizenship a requirement at the time of voter registration, and to streamline the enforcement process to make it more efficient, such as by allowing states and not just counties to prosecute voter-fraud cases.
Other states have implemented some of those provisions, but "no state has done all three," said Mr. Kobach.

He plans to have his bill ready to be pre-filed by Jan. 1, before the Legislature convenes Jan. 10. Both houses of the Legislature are controlled by Republicans, and Mr. Kobach said he's "very optimistic the legislation will pass."

Still, the proposal's success would have to come over the opposition of the Kansas Voter Coalition, a newly formed group of liberal organizations aimed at capsizing Mr. Kobach's movement. The coalition's members say the photo-identification requirement will result in disenfranchising voters, particularly the elderly, the disabled, minorities and the poor.

Eleven percent of registered voters nationwide have no photo identification, according to a study by the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law. In Kansas, that figure is probably higher because many older, rural voters were born at home and don't always have birth certificates, which are necessary for many forms of photo I.D., said Ernestine Krehbiel, president of the League of Women Voters of Kansas.

"The unintended consequences of this are going to cause hardship and decreased voter turnout," Ms. Krehbiel said.

Thomas Witt, president of the Kansas Equality Coalition, said he also worried that transgendered people could be turned away at the polls because their identification might not reflect their gender.

"Birth certificates do not reflect their gender," Mr. Witt said. "I've already heard from transgendered people having a hard time voting because they haven't changed all their documents. Right there, you're having people being disenfranchised."

During the campaign, Mr. Kobach's foes asked whether a voter-fraud law was necessary, given that the state has had only six convictions since 2002 and some of those cases involved people voting in Kansas and then another state, a situation Mr. Kobach's proposal wouldn't cover.

Cracked Ms. Krehbiel, "As one of our coalition members said, you have a better chance of being bitten by a great white shark than finding a voter-fraud case in Kansas."

Mr. Kobach countered that Kansas voters must be concerned about the issue, given that they elected him overwhelmingly.

"I won by a landslide, and I clearly made stopping voter fraud my No. 1 issue," Mr. Kobach said. "I feel like I have a mandate, and I hope legislators will also see that."

On the other hand, Ms. Krehbiel said, his election could be attributed to other factors.

"He's very young, attractive and personable. He speaks very well," said Ms. Krehbiel. "While he claims this mandate is a result of his platform, I don't think that's why he won."

Mr. Kobach appears to have the law on his side. Indiana's voter-fraud law, which requires voters to show unexpired, government-issued photo I.D. at the polls, was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2008 and again by the Indiana Supreme Court in June.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (97012)12/17/2010 11:29:31 AM
From: JakeStraw3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224845
 
During the Bush presidency, the top 1% paid a greater and greater share of the tax burden, while the bottom 95% paid a smaller and smaller share. In 2007, the top 1% actually paid more in federal income tax (just over 40% of total income taxes paid) than the bottom 95% (just under 40%). Thus, the truth is the exact opposite of the story told by Obama an his minions.