SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: grusum who wrote (97024)12/17/2010 12:16:44 PM
From: Ann Corrigan3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224769
 
A Dem(not d@mn:) sibling managed to pull me into a political discussion as I was inviting him to a Christmas party. As if that was difficult. He pursued the 'discussion' despite the fact I didn't throttle back at all in my firm belief that the modern Democrat Party is destructive for all Americans.

His only arguments to defend the libs were the archaic "Repubs would like to repeal Soc Sec" and "Pres Bush left such a disastrous situation it's taking O over 2yrs to make any positive difference." Without the 'mean old GOP' and 'it's all Bush's fault' retorts, they literally have nothing in their quiver to defend O's failed presidency.



To: grusum who wrote (97024)12/17/2010 1:35:10 PM
From: Ann Corrigan2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224769
 
Never let being angry at a Repub candidate keep you from voting for him/her. If we do, the dangerous Libs win. Sometimes we might need to hold our noses, but voting for the party that will uphold the Constitution (and respect the US military, private property rights, etc) should take priority over disappointment about individual Repub candidates.