Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (42135)	12/18/2010 7:02:30 PM
From: John	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

Exactly, Honey Bee. The whole reason that men and women are berthed in different buildings with members of their own sex is that women would not be comfortable appearing naked in front of a room full of men or in the showers at the gym with men ogling their bodies. I don't blame them. I would not want any female in my family to experience that. So, separate living and showering arrangements is a good idea. It always has been. Now, Congress has ruined that idea. What if a lesbian has her sites set on a straight woman? She is able to see all of her goodies any time she likes. Likewise for men. If a straight man is taking a shower, the last thing he wants is a homo checking him out. So, now what? Will the military have separate berthing and showers for normal men, normal women, homos, and leszbos? What about the switch hitters? While Congress is at it, why not let the child molesters in too? After all, they also have needs, illegal and disgusting as they are. -nfg-