SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (97198)12/20/2010 3:36:24 AM
From: d[-_-]b2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224928
 
in private he made Osama his top priority

In public he made regime change in Iraq the top priority - but libtards attacked Bush for taking the next steps.

The only way I can square it is libtards politicized the war - sort of like the lack of code pink and cindy shehan protests since odumbo escalated the wars even further than Bush.

Then we have that Eric Holder genius trying gitmo terrorists on US soil and the whole closure of gitmo - odumbo is a disaster of not only broken promises but stupid ideas.



To: Thomas M. who wrote (97198)12/20/2010 10:44:32 AM
From: Sedohr Nod3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224928
 
the fact that Clinton pleaded with the American public to take Osama more seriously

What does that mean? Some of us on this thread would have gladly turned the Seals loose on his sorry ass had we the option. Sadly, all that wonderful pleading didn't give us the power to act.



To: Thomas M. who wrote (97198)12/21/2010 9:09:13 PM
From: Ann Corrigan2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224928
 
I'm not a lib, Thomas - I do not lie. You've been rubbing elbows for far too long with those who believe their ends justify whatever means they choose to take, in order to stuff illogical liberal policies down everyone else's throats. How can you sleep at night knowing you've joined forces with those determined to destroy the original founders vision for the USA with faulty, unworkable Marxist/socialist drivel?