Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (9264)	12/21/2010 10:45:48 AM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10087

So you have two 'how to' questions on the table. You could run into problems trying to increase consideration and good manners in the same venue, since some applications of getting people to consider the value of particular issues involves shaking up the status quo a bit. But if it's consideration for others the two are tied together. Manners are a product of custom paired with common sense and a particular type of consideration. Consideration with regards to the comfort or well being of others. Refusing to observe an archaic custom with vague or no practical purpose could still be labeled bad manners, which is why common sense must be factored in. Bad manners are not always just not being educated in proper decorum, bad manners can hurt feelings, be a disruption to others or even cause physical harm; like pushing through a crowd which can have a domino effect, like stumbling, or tramplings. Consideration of good manners, is then a product of instruction regarding common custom, reasoned consideration with regards to circumstantial application, and the use of common sense in real time experience. Of course you could just attempt to subdue the masses by force.