SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SteveF who wrote (4070)12/20/2010 8:42:25 PM
From: scionRespond to of 53574
 
Message 26403093

Message 26411032



To: SteveF who wrote (4070)12/20/2010 8:46:25 PM
From: jimmenkneeRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 53574
 
I am with you on the separation of the 2 return transactions with the first suspiciously similar in share numbers to the JBI-DE S1; but both are reported retired by JBI-NV and there is no line entry to account for a new issuance to match, as well as no discernible unaccounted for issuance in the current OS (of that magnitude).



To: SteveF who wrote (4070)12/20/2010 8:49:47 PM
From: SteveFRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 53574
 
He could have acquired 10 mill shares from one (or more) of those original holders for a fraction of the $4.8 mill he was paid for them: the stock nor their issuance wouldn't be on the books anywhere, the Expedite2 folks get their fresh shares in the new company and Honest John (or his puppet-master) pockets millions.

I feel dirty after figuring this out.

Message 26977691

Message 26977381


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News