To: Brumar89 who wrote (11519 ) 12/23/2010 4:23:25 PM From: Solon Read Replies (2) | Respond to No. I did not. I very seldom read any of your long cut and pastes for two reasons: Firstly, I figure you generally don't read them, so why should I? and secondly, if it has a true meaning for you--then it is likely puerile, irrational, or both. In this instance, I did my ten second scroll and saw what appeared to be a story that would be a waste of valuable time for me. I did not see the part that you obviously inserted about scoffing at the unknown."Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. "anything or that I take a neutral opinion in all matters of superstition?. That seems a rather odd way of interpreting what I said. And it is incorrect. Perhaps you were distracted at the time and had other matters on your mind. Be that as it may, let me hasten to correct you by stating I have scoffed at the transparent mythology in the bible being presented as factual history since a very early age.wondering whether he was paranoid or not, then it is not surprising that he would couch his superstitious fears in the supernatural dogma that apparently suffused and permeated his existence (to the point where he even tried to impose his values on his coworkers). His control issues seem to indicate a fellow dealing with obsessive compulsive issues which would surely dovetail nicely with his ability to accept outlandishly transparent superstitions as factual.I scoff at the known. I scoff at people who know they can fall 1 mile without a parachute and live. I scoff at someone who knows he can eat a deadly poison and live. I scoff at someone who knows they can think quite clearly with their head cut off. And I scoff at the bible which is a foolish and puerile mythology of no value to humanity.
