SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (596189)12/23/2010 3:31:44 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576159
 
I see the difference between the haves and have nots expanding.
It's not healthy.

The middle-lower end (especially, the private sector) is getting slaughtered while the upper end gets bailed out or walled in.

Where we live might just have a lot to do with it.



To: Alighieri who wrote (596189)12/23/2010 5:34:03 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576159
 
>> any large system will be imperfect..

Probably true, but certainly true of the federal government.

So, why in hell do you want to give them even more responsibility?

With few exceptions government f*cks everything up. And even when they get it right, as Bush did with Medicare Part D, the liberals will come along later and f*ck THAT up, too (as was done with Obamacare closing the "donut hole", the very thing that made Part D such a resounding success).

Our government fails because of liberalism.



To: Alighieri who wrote (596189)12/23/2010 9:17:25 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576159
 
Al, > Horse radish...any large system will be imperfect...

Maybe there's wisdom in limited government?

But that would involve you actually admitting that there's wisdom behind the Tea Party movement ...

Tenchusatsu